A story from last year (“Greece says Verizon telecoms apologizes over unlicensed Parthenon advert”) explains that 'commercial' use of photographs of ancient monuments require substantial fees and must be approved by senior officials.
(found via a post by PhDiva with pictures of J. Lo. vamping on the Acropolis).
I'm not sure what 'commercial' use is. Would a textbook targeting high schools be 'commercial'? There is something very troubling when a government believes that some fields of endeavor (for example, businesses) deserve less speech rights than others. Does this law mean that if/when the Elgin marbles go back to Greece it will be against the law to print pictures of them?
Goldman Sachs Power and Influence Benefit Archaeology Lobby? - A front page article in Sunday's New York Times raises some important questions about how cultural heritage policy is made in the United States that deserv...
4 hours ago